Passionate love vs companionate love psychology

Autor:

Passionate love vs companionate love psychology
Passionate love vs companionate love psychology

This early scientific theory of romantic love tended toward an eitheror view, either passion or companionship, but not both at once. This view may well have had cultural validity during much of the twentieth century. However, Elaine Hatfield (formerly Elaine Walster) noted that people are capable of both types of love and may experience them intermittently during their lives (Hatfield 1988).

Video on demand, passionate love vs companionate love psychology

Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name. Please search for Passionate and companionate loveRK2RS8oGd2LecQ GPihVBbnHpoDyrsA0- in Wikipedia to check for alternative titles or spellings.

People appear to want both types of romantic love. Passion is pleasurable, but its associated strong emotion creates the potential for relationship instability. Lovers want stability and often desire friendship. Several recent studies show that romance and friendship are often combined in todays Western cultural milieu. Susan and Clyde Hendrick (1993) collected written accounts of love, and found that friendship with the lover was the most frequently desired characteristic. Susan Sprecher and Pamela Regan (1998) also found that both passion and companionship were related to relationship satisfaction and commitment. Pat Noller (1996) concluded that a mix of passionate and companionate love best supports the continuity of marriage and family. But passion is important; erotic love is one important predictor of relationship satisfaction, regardless of length of the relationship (Hendrick and Hendrick 2000). Passion alone may not be enough, however; perhaps we must be friends with the one we love in order for love to last. The recent research and theorizing on passionate and friendship love is consistent with the prototype theory of love developed by Fehr.

Ellen Berscheid and Elaine Walster (1969, 1978) proposed the distinction between love as passion and love as friendly companionship. These authors construed passionate love as a state of total absorption between two lovers, including mood swings, intense emotions (pleasurable and aversive), and obsessive thinking. Companionate love was construed as the affection two people feel for each other when their lives are deeply intertwined. According to Elaine and G. William Walster (1978), most passionate love affairs end in breakups. But if a couple is lucky, passion can change into the mild glow of companionate love. In essence, passion becomes friendship.

Questions and answers to the phrase, passionate love vs companionate love psychology

Question: Quali sono le caratteristiche distintive dell'amore di compagnia?

Answer: Intimità, fiducia, comprensione reciproca, impegno a lungo termine e affetto caloroso.

Question: Come si evolvono tipicamente l'amore passionale e l'amore di compagnia in una relazione a lungo termine?

Answer: L'amore passionale tende a diminuire nel tempo, mentre l'amore di compagnia può aumentare e rafforzarsi.

Question: In che modo la psicologia spiega l'importanza sia dell'amore passionale che dell'amore di compagnia in una relazione romantica?

Answer: L'amore passionale fornisce l'eccitazione e l'attrazione iniziale, mentre l'amore di compagnia fornisce stabilità, sicurezza e connessione profonda nel tempo.

Question: Quali sono i marcatori dell'amore passionale?

Answer: Infatuazione, desiderio sessuale intenso, idealizzazione del partner e emozioni estreme.

Question: Qual è la principale differenza tra amore passionale e amore di compagnia secondo la psicologia?

Answer: L'amore passionale è caratterizzato da intensa attrazione fisica ed emotiva, mentre l'amore di compagnia è basato su intimità, fiducia e affetto profondo.